Foundations of geometric cognition
London-New York: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056291
Mateusz Hohol
Ph.D., assistant professor at the Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of the Jagiellonian University. His research concentrates mainly on the cognitive science/psychology of mathematics, i.e., cognitive processing of numbers and geometric structures, as well as conceptual and methodological issues in cognitive (neuro)science.
more information
Dr. Hohol published three books, including “Foundations of geometric cognition” (Routledge, 2020), and several papers in journals such as Psychological Research, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, PeerJ, Frontiers in Psychology, Foundations of Science, Theory & Psychology, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, Scientific Reports. He co-edited five books, e.g., “The concept of explanation” (CCPress, 2017), and special issues of Theory & Psychology (2019) and Synthese (2020). Dr. Hohol is a member of European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP), Mathematical Cognition and Learning Society (MCLS), Commission for Philosophy of Sciences of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, and Polish Society for Cognitive Science. He received a number of awards and scholarships, including the “Start” Scholarship of the Foundation for Polish Science, the Scientific Prize of “Polityka” (one of the most read Polish weeklies), and Scholarship of the Minister of Science and Higher Education for outstanding young scientists. Full list of publications is available at www.hohol.pl/en
contact & external resources
office/correspondence: Kopernika St 27 (room 26), 31-501 Kraków, Poland (Google Maps)
e-mail: mateusz.hohol@uj.edu.pl
website: www.hohol.pl/en
Google Scholar profile: link
ResearchGate profile: link
ORCID profile: link
Selected publications
Show
Scientific Reports (accepted), 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/evzpa
Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning
Foundations of Science, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09603-w
Mechanisms in psychology: The road towards unity?
Theory and Psychology, 2019, 29(5), 576-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319875218 (the entire Special Issue is here: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tapa/29/5)
From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution
Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9(2393). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393
PeerJ: the Journal of Life and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 6(e5878). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5878
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2018, 45(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z
Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2017.
Bringing back the balance: Domain-general processes are also important in numerical cognition
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8(499). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00499
Commentary: The poverty of embodied cognition
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8(845). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00845
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2017, 11(154). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00154
Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations
Psychological Research, 2016, 80, 710–726. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6
Language as a tool: An insight from cognitive science
Studia Humana, 2015, 4(2), 16–25. http://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2015-0013
Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013.